What Sonic fans have seemed to have not noticed about modern Sonic games

Okay, we all know Sonic the Hedgehog; Sega's cool, blue and super fast mascot, right? But we also may know that Sonic's game have not done well lately, minus the recent Sonic game, Sonic Unleashed, which has seemed to be getting some really unnecessary hate from people all over.

While Sonic games like Heroes, Shadow the Hedgehog, Sonic 06' (even though I enjoyed those games honestly) have been medicore at most to Sonic fans and reviewers alike or really disliked. However, Sega may have gotten it right with Sonic Unleashed, or Sonic World Adventure as it is called in Japan. If you don't let the nighttime levels, where you control Sonic the Werehog (Sonic's alter ego at night) bother you; the daytime levels, which have Sonic's trademark speed gameplay will blow you away.

But first, I will attemt to explain why some of the arguements/debates/complaints in the Sonic fandom and maybe outside of it are flawed or ridiculous.

First, I don't know why people say that Sonic is about speed alone. Sure it is about a supersonic speedy hedgehog, and you control him and race past levels at breakneck speed, but I think there is something that most people may not have noticed.

I don't think Sonic is just about Speed alone. It just gives that thrilling roller coaster feeling. The game may seem to be about speed, but the player should also be aware that the reaction time involved is what makes things great.

The reaction time with the controls to get Sonic to avoid obstacles is just half of what makes it fun. The reacting is what makes you have that adrenaline fell of the Sonic game you play. Seeing Sonic run through levels at reckless speed it the other half of the experiencing how fun Sonic games are.

It seems to me that reaction time and speed are confused with each other through many Sonic fans. But even with a good reaction time the player has, the game still has to be wild and fast to have the same feel as the classic era. For example, even if a player had a good reaction time in Sonic Heroes or Sonic Next Gen, the game may still not have that fast pace feel those players would want in a Sonic game. In fact, glitches in such games and bad controls may take away the fun of experiencing fun through the player's reaction time, since bad controls, glitches, and possibly slow framerates impeding the player's ability to play the game!

The Werehog gameplay in Sonic Unleashed is being bashed for its slow. However, even if it was that slow, the many combos and moves the werehog can do should have a different, but still fun experience if it is balanced enough for the controls and has no glitches. When evened for the player's reaction time; the combat performance of the Werehog and well done controls and such may possibly be fun to gamers of all ages if they can "keep up" with the Werehog gameplay.

What I am trying to say, is that it is not ENTIRELY the speed in Sonic games that makes it fun; the game is all nothing without good reaction time to avoid enemies, obstacles, finding new paths and routes, etc.

Also, there is platforming involved. Platforming was another reason why Sonic games were great when Sonic 1 for the Sega Genesis/Mega Drive came out. Precision platforming is what made Sonic popular back then along with the other important part of the gameplay, which is speed. The platforming was what made Genesis Sonic games challenging in fun. Without any platforming, Sonic would just be running from point A to B, which would eventually get boring in a short amount of time! Sonic was never just about speed ALONE. The precision platforming added with the speed, and the reaction time to deal with enemies and obstacles in early Sonic games, were all what made Sonic so special as a gaming character.

I know that Sega has not done well in making good Sonic games lately; especially by adding different forms of gameplay, or what one may call gimmicks. Knuckles' treasure hunting in Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 were not well liked at all among Sonic fans. The three man team system in Sonic Heroes was not really well recieved, despite being innovative. Tails' and Eggman's shooting levels in Sonic Adventure 2 weren't all that hot. Shadow using weapons catergorized as guns in the gameplay of his own game and having to complete different missions in his own game gave fans mixed, but many reasons to hate Shadow. As for Silver the Hedgehog from Sonic Next Gen, not only was his telekinetic powers unoriginal, but he became strongly hated by many for being so slow compared to the two other playable characters; Sonic and Shadow. Finally, Big the Cat's gameplay in Sonic Adventure 1 is still mostly hated by fans to this day.

But why was Sega trying to add such things? Heck! Why did they decide to throw the Werehog in Sonic Unleashed? Simple:

So that the game would not have to be finished in under five minutes. Think about it. If the next Sonic game was to come out with just you controlling Sonic and running through several levelss before beating the game, would you want to play the game again...and again...and again?

You know you wouldn't! That is wny Sega has added different forms of gameplay: so that players could get tired less quickly from playing the game. I know not all forms of gameplay Sega has added in Sonic games were not fun, but at least Sega wanted to make Sonic games longer so they would not quickly become boring all the time.

Now, let me add something. Some fans of the Sonic franchise say that Sega should make a Sonic Adventure 3. Others say that Sega should do what Capcom did with Megaman 9 and make a Sonic 4. Fans think that these strategies would save the Sonic franchise. Would it?

No it would not! One game cannot save the rest of the franchise, and it could still be as bad as some past 3d Sonic games. Besides, Sonic Heroes and Sonic 06' were all originally going to be called Sonic Adventure 3. Those games had shared some aspects in common with the first two Sonic Adventure games, but they went by different names. Plus, even of one of these games were named Sonic Adventure 3, it would not make a difference of the quality those games turned out to have.

As far as going retro with a Sonic 4; how should it be done? It has been years since Sonic 3 and Sonic and Knuckles came out, and no, Sonic and Knuckles is not Sonic 4! Besides, the Genesis Sonic games were not made by Sonic Team, but a completely different team from Sega, which has since been disbanded. What is the point of making Sonic 4 when Sonic Team did not make the Genesis games and the team who did is no longer around?

This is about the bad reviews some biased game reviewers like IGN and the like and such gave Sonic Unleashed bad reviews...well, for the Xbox 360/PS3 versions anyway. IGN and Gamespot gave a bad score to Sonic Unleashed backed up with bad reasoning. Also, they gave that game a score lower than what they gave Sonic 06', which is actually much terrible than Sonic Unleashed! I will attempt to explain why Sonic Unleashed for the Wii and PS2 got better scores and reviews than their superior versions. Just to give a head start, I loved Sonic Unleashed! I have nothing against it. Not even the Were hog!

So here goes nothing!

About the framerate issues, controls and hub worlds stuff that IGN and other biased reviewers have complained about; they were all more of a problem than in Sonic 06. Not to mention that Sonic Unleashed had far fewer bugs and glitches than Sonic 06.

Now, it seems that IGN and the like took the faults out of Sonic '06 and superimposed them into their review of Sonic Unleashed to overexaggerate the games faults, even if they were non-existent.

If IGN, Gamespot and the like hate Sonic that much, they must have brought some faults of Sonic 06 as they saw them so they could try to influence the public as if Sonic Unleashed was worse than Sonic 06, even when it's all BS.

And the fuel all comes from their "hatred" for Sonic.

So essentially, those reviewers are trying to bring the past (the common faults of past, 3D Sonic games) into the present where such fewer faults exist (a la Sonic Unleashed).

See where I'm coming from?

Also, to expand, the reviewers seemed aware about how the Wii/PS2 version would turn out. They knew it would be inferior to the other versions (Xbox360/PS3). So, they took advantage of this by making their reviews of the Wii/PS2 versions in away so they would seem better than the 360/PS3 versions to those who read their reviews. The exact reason they would do this when the Xbox 360/PS3 version is the actual superior version is still a mystery to me, but it does seem that the reviewers wanted to get their readers to buy the Wii version by giving it high scores (regardless of what it lacks compared to the 360 version) so that they would end up buying a less fun/boring/dull version of the game when they said through their review rather than getting the better made 360 version. This way, they could have their readers end up as likely to hate Sonic even more, considering how the Wii version actually turned out, which they seemed aware of to begin with.

Note: I actually don't think the Wii version is bad at all. What you read about the Wii version was from a Hardcore gamer's perspective.

Well, do not listen to IGN or other reviewers now. Sonic Unleashed is actually better than Sonic 06'. In fact, it is much, much better! If you don't let the slowness and the repetivite combat system of Sonic Unleashed bother you, they daytime levels of the game will blow you away! This game is a step in the right direction for Sonic! It may not be a complete comeback for the blue blur, but this game is still something many Sonic fans and maybe newcomers to the franchise to enjoy!

Bfore I end this blog post, I want to say one more thing. Did you all really think that Sonic Unleashed was going to be a return to Sonic's roots? Wherever you have heard that, you thought wrong! This game did try to add some sections of past and classic Sonic games into the works, but Yoshihisa Hashimoto; the new head of Sonic Team who directed this game already said that he was not planning to go back to Sonic's roots while making this game.

Just look here:

http://blogs.ign.com/SEGA_SonicUnleashed/2008/10/23/104478/

At the very bottom, under the bolded part, "Back to its roots?" he says...

"I’ve been asked a lot of times if “Sonic is going back to its roots” in interviews. My answer is always “No.” Sonic Unleashed still retains the spirit from his Genesis days, which is his origin. But it’s only one of the many amazing qualities of Sonic Unleashed. We are learning from and taking good bits from his origin but we are not “going back” at all. And actually, I wanted to “go beyond” the origin."

Well, there you have it. Whoever told you that this game was going back to Sonic's roots have mislead you easily, and made it so by the time you got this game, you would think Sega lied to you when they never even planned to go back to Sonic's roots!

Now there you have it. This is the end of this blog post. Oh, and sorry for the length of this.